SBA Loans vs. Merchant Cash Advances: What Healthcare Practice Owners Need to Know

SBA Loans vs. Merchant Cash Advances: What Healthcare Practice Owners Need to Know

If you own a healthcare practice and you’ve ever Googled “business funding” or “working capital,” your inbox has probably been flooded with offers for merchant cash advances. They promise fast money with minimal paperwork, and when cash flow is tight, that pitch can be tempting.

But before signing anything, it’s worth understanding how MCAs compare to SBA-backed financing. The differences are significant, and choosing the wrong option can cost your practice tens of thousands of dollars.

What is a merchant cash advance?

An MCA isn’t technically a loan. It’s an advance against your future revenue. The MCA company gives you a lump sum, and in return, they take a percentage of your daily credit card receipts (or a fixed daily withdrawal from your bank account) until you’ve repaid the advance plus a fee.

The fee is expressed as a “factor rate,” typically between 1.2 and 1.5. So if you receive a $100,000 advance at a 1.4 factor rate, you repay $140,000. That might not sound terrible until you calculate the effective annual interest rate, which often lands between 40% and 150% depending on how quickly the advance is repaid.

What is an SBA working capital loan?

An SBA loan is a traditional loan backed by the Small Business Administration. You receive a lump sum, make fixed monthly payments over a set term (up to 10 years for working capital), and the interest rate is regulated by the SBA with caps tied to the prime rate.

Current SBA working capital rates for established practices are significantly lower than MCA rates. The monthly payment is predictable, and the total cost of borrowing is a fraction of what an MCA would cost.

The real cost comparison

Let’s say your practice needs $150,000 in working capital. Here’s a simplified comparison:

With an MCA at a 1.35 factor rate repaid over 12 months, you’d repay approximately $202,500. That’s $52,500 in fees for one year of capital.

With an SBA working capital loan at current rates over a 10-year term, your total interest cost over the life of the loan would be significantly less, and your monthly payment would be substantially lower because of the longer term.

The MCA costs more in fees in one year than the SBA loan costs in total interest over ten years. That’s the gap.

When does an MCA make sense?

Honestly, almost never for an established healthcare practice. MCAs were originally designed for businesses with poor credit that couldn’t access traditional financing. If your practice has been operating for two or more years and you have a credit score above 650, you almost certainly qualify for SBA financing at far better terms.

The only scenario where an MCA might make sense is if you need cash within 24 to 48 hours for a genuine emergency and you can repay it quickly. But even then, a business line of credit would be a better option.

The bottom line

Healthcare practices are among the strongest candidates for SBA-backed financing. Before considering an MCA or any high-cost financing product, take 10 minutes to see what you qualify for through an SBA program. You might be leaving tens of thousands of dollars on the table.

SwellFi connects healthcare practice owners with SBA-backed working capital programs. No obligation, no credit impact to pre-qualify. Contact Tom Corona at 561.445.8164 or tom@swellfi.com.

SHARE IT: